Tuesday, March 16, 2010

Coocoo for Hawaii-Puffs

I am obsessed with going to Hawaii again. Last summer, my wife and I went to Maui on vacation. It was actually her idea -- I wanted to go to New York City again, after we'd gone on our honeymoon. I won the coin toss, but let her have her Hawaiian vacation because we'd never been there before.

Turns out, I love Hawaii. While there are a lot of beautiful places, Hawaii is a different kind of beauty, one that's almost transcendent. I imagine Alaska as being the "forest-y" equivalent to Hawaii's "tropical" beauty, not properly describable in petty words. The vibe there is unlike anywhere else I've ever been. It's basically a different world if you're used to the bustle-and-flow of daily life in the continental forty-eight.

The first time we went there, we didn't do a whole lot, because we mainly just wanted to take it all in and spend a lot of time on the beach. We under-utilized our rental car and had a lot of down-time we could have better passed. The trip was further marred a bit by an irritation on my thighs, a puking incident while snorkeling Black Rock, and a hellishly long final day waiting for our plane flight home. However, none of this was much of a deterrent. I still want to go back.

I'm hoping we can return in March 2011, during humpback whale season. One of the few things I really want to do in life is see the whales in Hawaii. I also want to see the volcanoes on the Big Island, but I think overall, there's more of an interest to go back to Maui and do some of the things we skipped on the first time: going to the Old Lahaina Luau, riding bikes down the Haleakala volcano, and of course going to whale-watch. I also want to go snorkeling at Molokini crater, but I don't think Jess will go for snorkeling again, given the experience last time.

We'll see if this trip actually comes to fruition. There are other places we have in mind for vacation, and Maui is really expensive. The hotel/airfare is not too much worse price-wise than a lot of other luxury-type vacations, but once you're on an island, everything else costs A LOT -- particularly if you're going to do any organized outdoor pursuits.

I leave you with some particularly beautiful shots of Maui:

Kaanapali Beach


Haleakala:


Molokini crater:

Friday, February 26, 2010

The Conet Project

I recently discovered what is perhaps the creepiest collection of recorded audio in the history of recorded audio. The Conet Project is a four-disc compilation of "numbers station" broadcasts.

Numbers stations are basically shortwave lo-fi radio broadcasts of seemingly random information/sound. Sometimes, the audio consists of just feedback, machine noises, and other such ambience. Other times there is spoken audio, generally performed by women or children, generally distorted, and generally reciting a series of numbers or letters in any variety of languages, including English, German, Russian, and Polish. Sometimes there is musical accompaniment and sometimes it's just a voice.

No one knows for sure where these numbers stations are broadcast from or what their purpose is, but they've apparently been around since World War I and it's assumed that they broadcast encoded messages for spies "in the field", although no government agency has admitted to this. It's more fun, to me, to think of them as mysterious transmissions from beyond the grave, intended only for a select handful of people to understand and interpret.

The Conet Project has been released on CD by British label Irdial-Discs, which has also made the collection available for free download. If you're brave and interested in being scared shitless, then please go download it, put it on your iPod, and then listen to it whilst driving at night, possible while along a dimly-lit empty stretch of road.

Links:

The Conet Project on Wikipedia.org
Download The Conet Project
Numbers Stations on Wikipedia.org

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Kick-Ass Albums: Misfits "Walk Among Us"

Lodi, New Jersey's Misfits are perhaps the greatest punk band of all time. Although former front man Glenn Danzig has gone on to bigger things, he's definitely not done better things. The Misfits, dressed like 50s greaser zombies with a punk rock attitude, remain one of the most original bands in the history of rock, churning out 3-chord, 2-minute sing-a-long punk/hardcore gems whose lyrics were primarily concerning horror-film mayhem.

"Walk Among Us" was their first properly-released full-length album, unleashed upon the unsuspecting listening masses in 1982. Each of the album's thirteen tracks is blessed with the most addictive vocal lines since The Beatles, and the subject matter is suitably cheesy and outlandish enough to please the most ardent horror fan. The album perfectly encapsulates what the band's about, in a succinct package.

Although it somewhat compromises the Misfits' underground credentials, they, along with precursors the Ramones, are pretty much entirely responsible for the anthemic and catchy choruses that comprise modern-day pop punk bands like Blink-182. You'll find it very hard to resist shouting lines like "I want your skull! I need your skull!" or "I turned into a martian! Whoa-oh-oh!"

There aren't many bands more addictive than the Misfits and this album is probably the most concise example of the band's simplistic, straightforward, but powerful music. There's no fat here: thirteen tracks in twenty-five minutes; verse-chorus-verse-chorus with an intro and outro here and there; aliens, monsters, and murders; devil-locks, leather, and grease-paint; oohs and aaahs and backing vocals galore. This is Halloween put to record.

Friday, February 19, 2010

Kick-Ass Albums: SPK "Leichenschrei"

Back before Nine Inch Nails exposed so-called industrial music to the masses, there were fun bands like Australia's SPK. This prototypical industrial music was less music and more like a full-length sound collage. There were no riffs or hooks to be found, replaced by tape loops, sound clips, ambient noises, and rhythm, though generally not produced by a drum kit. Any vocals or traditional instruments were generally distorted beyond recognition, twisted and manipulated into something more punishing and abstract.

SPK's second full-length, "Leichenschrei" -- which translates to "corpse screams" -- is suitably punishing and abstract. On the surface, the album is fourteen tracks of noises -- breaking glass, churning machinery, clips of conversations here and there, screams, things snapping and breaking, so on. However, taken in proper context -- namely an otherwise quiet listening environment, perhaps sans lights, and given full concentration -- the album is an extremely frightening and potent aural experience. The album exudes a strong atmosphere, a mix of terror, insanity, introspection, and nihilism, conjuring visuals that are part asylum and part morgue. If you've ever read Mark Z. Danielewski's novel, "House of Leaves," then imagine this album as the soundtrack to wandering the endless black corridors of that house.

So maybe this album can't be construed as music, but it's certainly effective listening. It requires a certain mood, a dark mood glazed with touches of existential angst, sadness, emptiness, fear, and maybe awe. It's unusual and original and soul-blackening. Listen with caution, but definitely listen.

Monday, December 14, 2009

Shock Theater

In the past couple of weeks, I've read a couple of so-called "shocking" books: J.G. Ballard's "Crash" and Poppy Z. Brite's "Exquisite Corpse." Both are explicit explorations of where sex and violence intersect, but each approaches this taboo differently.

Ballard's novel centers around the budding affair between a car-crash survivor and the widow of a man he killed in said car crash. Having both escaped the wreckage of this fatal accident, they find that their once-latent violent desires are now thrashing to the surface. They soon come across a man, Vaughn, who shares their same erotic predilection toward road accidents and who enjoys re-creating famous car crashes of the past. Before long, a self-destructive love triangle forms that envelopes a number of fringe players, as well: the protagonist's wife, another car-crash-survivor friend of Vaughn's, and a stunt driver Vaughn uses in his crash re-creations.

The sex is explicit and plentiful, but severely clinical. Rarely is human sexuality referred to in any but the most anatomical of ways: penis, vagina, anus, fellatio, intercourse, coitus, etc. The characters do not make emotional attachments and their numerous affairs are as perfunctory and mechanical as the cars that inspire them. The characters seem driven -- pun partially intended -- toward fulfilling their own violent ends, urged forward by the rush of having precipitously walked the line of mortality. Ultimately, the protagonist (named after the author) is able to walk away from this pursuit after having witnessed Vaughn's demise in his final car crash. Ironically, Ballard's dabbling in empty sex and extreme fetishism leads to his emotional growth and the renewed closeness between him and his wife.

The author's writing style is interesting and lends credibility to bold subject matter that could have easily descended into parody and pulp. There are a number of turns of phrase and bits of lexicon that are repeated almost ad nauseum, particularly in sections that attempt to liken human anatomy to automotive anatomy. However, the repetition seems necessary to emphasize that the characters are ultimately driving a fruitless road that takes them further away from the vibrancy and humanity they had been trying to re-capture through their sexual exploits.

Though the novel is interesting and well-written, it's probably not as profound as the author would have liked, and its borderline pornographic subject matter not appeal to many readers. However, its boldness is refreshing in a way that most novels could never attain.

Brite's novel is even bolder. Essentially, it's a gay love story between two serial-killing necrophiles: Andrew Compton and Jay Byrne. In addition to their shared sexual preference towards the dead, Jay also engages in cannibalism. Compton, an Englishman, fakes his own death in order to escape prison, and he flees to America -- specifically New Orleans, the murder capital of the country -- to begin his killing anew. Jay is a rich recluse whose unusual hobbies have entwined him with the rave-driven, often derelict underground, wherein he meets a Vietnamese teen named Tran who develops a dangerous attraction to Jay. Eventually, Jay and Andrew meet and their mutual interests grow into love, of a sort. They decide that making Tran their next victim will further strengthen their bond. Tran's obsessive ex-boyfriend, Lucas, ultimately impedes Jay and Andrew's pursuit of the perfect kill.

Like Ballard's novel, the story is explicit and pulls no punches. In addition to graphic (strictly homosexual) sex, "Exquisite Corpse" contains a strong dose of splatter and viscera. Descriptions of bodily mutilation, consumption and sexual objectification of dead human flesh, and other gruesome acts are laid out naked and unfettered. Though the story is shocking, Brite's intentions are not solely the stuff of the grand grimoire: she provides a stark insight into the AIDS pandemic, particularly its status as a "gay plague." A handful of the characters, including the main "protagonist" Andrew Compton, are HIV positive and the reader gets a harsh view of the world through the eyes of a pariah.

Brite's writing is darkly poetic and she makes the subject matter about as palatable as it could be. Though the novel switches points-of-view on occasion, it mostly sticks with the first-person recollections of Compton, and he has an interesting enough personality to drive the story without having to cling solely to the sex and gore. "Exquisite Corpse" is a novel that exposes a brutal underworld, and its central locale -- New Orleans -- is well-expressed and palpable as a living, breathing city, as a perfect host for the parasitic protagonists.

Both "Crash" and "Exquisite Corpse" are interesting, off-the-mainstream takes on the deviancy of the human race, though they are absolutely not for the weak-of-heart. Brite's work, in particular, is one of the most brutal assaults on the senses that I've ever read, so proceed with extreme caution.

Wednesday, October 14, 2009

Artist Focus: Esao Andrews

I ran across this guy the other day. I was just searching through Google and came across his name and really was caught up in his artwork. His work is very clean, and his subject matter is very fairytale-ish, but dark. Reminds me of a schizophrenic Alice in Wonderland.

You can check out his work at www.Esao.net.

Here's a few of my favorite pieces of his, and of course, they're copyrighted by the artist:


Monday, October 12, 2009

The Art World

For over 15 years now, I've been an artist. Rather, I should say that I've been able to draw ... sort of. When I was 12 or 13, I really liked drawing, mainly in pencil and pen-and-ink, and I had aspirations of illustrating comic books. (At the time, in the early 1990s, this was actually a pretty profitable career. Popular comic book artists were making damn fine money in the 90s boom, before the entire bottom fell out of the industry -- from which it has yet to really recover.)

However, once I turned 17 or so, music and writing really took over my creative interests, and drawing fell to the furthest back-burner and I barely picked up a drawing utensil for almost a decade. In the past year, my interest in illustrating has been somewhat rekindled. It started with pen-and-ink again, but has recently blossomed into painting. I've always been interested in painting, but assumed that with my semi-color-blindness (I have trouble discerning more subtle differences in color), that I would be a terrible painter. As a result, I never bothered actually trying it. I'm not typically a person who tries something without a reasonable expectation of succeeding.

After a bit of debate, and after finally coming to the realization that I had no desire to paint anything realistic anyway, I decided to give it a whirl. I picked up some acrylic paints from the art store and set to it. (Oil painting was where I really wanted to start, but it's enormously expensive when just starting out, so it was bypassed until I proved to myself that I'd be able to stick with it.) A handful of paintings later, things seem to be working out. I'm still feeling things out, and I'm unhappy that I have no discernible individual style yet, but that's to be expected for a beginner. We always start out imitating. Overall, I have more aptitude for painting than I had anticipated, though I'm no Picasso. Here's a few examples of what I've done so far:

"Blue Nightmare" - acrylic on paper


















"He Who Eats Fire" - acrylic and ink on paper


















"Not of the Earth" - acrylic on paper


















"Stalking the Dark" - acrylic on paper


















"The Toxic Dawn" - acrylic on paper


















So yeah, the output has been okay so far, though it's all just sort of blah. Blah subject matter, blah style, blah blah blah. With time, I'm sure I'll stumble upon a style that represents what I really want to be doing, and I'll think of imaginative, non-derivative things to paint. But, at least I think I know that I "can," which is pretty important I'm sure.

Going forward, if this is going to be a fairly serious hobby of mine, I'm going to need to arrange a more permanent workspace. Right now, I'm just painting on the kitchen table, no easel or anything. I've already gotten a few small splatters of paint on the table that my wife is understandably not pleased about. However, I also don't want to invest in an easel and take up more space in an already cramped room of our house if I'm ultimately going to give up on painting. That doesn't seem like it'll be the case so far, since I've been pretty excited about it all so far. We'll see before too long, though!